${site.data.firmName} ${site.data.firmName}
Free Consultation No recovery - No Fee
215-822-7575 / 800-358-9367
Practice Areas

Understanding Pennsylvania’s Post Conviction Relief Act

Due to issues with the criminal justice system, ineffective counsel and a number of other reasons, you may feel that you were not treated fairly during your trial. In certain circumstances, you may be able to seek post-conviction relief from the court. At Rubin, Glickman, Steinberg & Gifford, P.C., we are often asked what you can do about an unfair trial. In this post then, we will discuss the state’s Post Conviction Relief Act, or PRCA.

There are certain eligibility requirements that must be met in order to obtain relief under Pennsylvania’s PCRA. According to state law, you must prove the following:

  •        You were convicted of a crime under state law and are currently serving a prison sentence, probation or parole for the offense
  •        You were convicted due to at least one pre-specified error
  •        The alleged error was not previously waived or litigated

You must also provide proof that the failure to litigate the issue before or during the trial, or on direct appeal, was not the result of a strategic, rational or tactical decision by your legal representative.

State law stipulates the types of errors that may be used to seek relief under the PCRA. The most common reason for a PCRA challenge is that your legal representation was ineffective. This means that he or she failed to provide you with the best defense possible. A violation of the state’s Constitution, or the Constitution of the U.S., as well as unlawfully inducing a guilty plea may be considered qualifying errors. Furthermore, receiving a sentence that is greater than the legal maximum, holding proceedings in a tribunal that does not have jurisdiction, and finding new evidence or proving that existing evidence was overlooked during the original trial may also provide grounds for relief.

For more information about appellate law in the state of Pennsylvania, please visit our criminal defense appeals page.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | US News 2018
  • RGS&G Firm News

    Attorney Amy R. Stern, a partner at the Lansdale law firm of Rubin, Glickman, Steinberg and Gifford, P.C, is co-presenting a seminar entitled Divorce 101 along with Marc Silverman, Senior Loan Officer of GMH Mortgage Services.Read more...

  • Super Lawyers | Rising Stars
  • National board of legal speciality certification
  • American college of trial lawyers
  • National board of trial advocacy | EST 1977
  • 2013 | Subarbanlife | Awesome Attorneys
  • PennSuburban | Chamber of commerce

Rubin, Glickman, Steinberg and Gifford has been a member of the local Penn Suburban Chamber of Commerce (previously known as North Penn Suburban Chamber of Commerce) for more than 25 years.

You Have Questions? We Have Answers. Fill out the form and an attorney will be in touch with you shortly.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

start now. send your request