${site.data.firmName} ${site.data.firmName}
Free Consultation No recovery - No Fee
215-822-7575 / 800-358-9367
Practice Areas

Does law enforcement need search warrants to use drug dogs?

Law enforcement agencies in Pennsylvania, and throughout the U.S., often use drug-sniffing dogs when investigating drug-related offenses. Like many who are the subjects of such investigations, you may question whether the use of these dogs on your private property was legal. In order to help ensure your rights are not violated, it may benefit you to understand what is required for authorities to use drug dogs.

You are likely aware that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides protection from unreasonable searches and seizures by government agents. As such, law enforcement officers cannot search your private property unless you have consented, there are illegal items in plain view, the search is related to a lawful arrest or there are other exigent circumstances.

Based on a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, law enforcement generally needs a search warrant in order to bring drug-sniffing dogs onto your private property. Depending on the circumstances, failing to do so could constitute a violation of your constitutional rights. The ruling arose out of a case that involved the search of a suspect’s home in Florida. A law enforcement officer took a drug dog to the man’s property. Through a closed front door, the dog detected drugs, specifically marijuana, in the home. Authorities then used that alert as evidence for a search warrant, which turned up a significant number of marijuana plants inside the home. The home’s occupant was arrested and charged with drug trafficking. However, the evidence obtained through the search was ultimately thrown out following the Supreme Court’s ruling.

This post provides an overview of search warrants and the use of drug sniffing dogs. However, you should keep in mind that the circumstances of each case may be unique. Therefore, you should take this post only as general information, and not as legal advice.   

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Best Lawyers | Best Law Firms | US News 2018
  • RGS&G Firm News

    Attorney Amy R. Stern, a partner at the Lansdale law firm of Rubin, Glickman, Steinberg and Gifford, P.C, is co-presenting a seminar entitled Divorce 101 along with Marc Silverman, Senior Loan Officer of GMH Mortgage Services.Read more...

  • Super Lawyers | Rising Stars
  • National board of legal speciality certification
  • American college of trial lawyers
  • National board of trial advocacy | EST 1977
  • 2013 | Subarbanlife | Awesome Attorneys
  • PennSuburban | Chamber of commerce

Rubin, Glickman, Steinberg and Gifford has been a member of the local Penn Suburban Chamber of Commerce (previously known as North Penn Suburban Chamber of Commerce) for more than 25 years.

You Have Questions? We Have Answers. Fill out the form and an attorney will be in touch with you shortly.

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

start now. send your request